ATLAS/BRIEFINGLaw, organized for consequential decisions.

DOSSIER · FAM

Family Financial Forensics

Finding, valuing, and dividing complex assets when a family case turns on money.

Brief stack

In this dossier

Full FAM desk →

FAM-05 · 01

Finding Digital and Crypto Assets in a Family Case

8 MIN · FAM

Digital holdings are traceable more often than people assume, but the trail runs through tax filings, bank records, and party production rather than through the blockchain alone.

  • Property division is state law. No federal statute tells a divorce court how to classify or divide a crypto holding or a monetized account.
  • Federal tax filings are the cheapest starting point: the digital asset question and reported dispositions both create documented, sworn admissions.
  • The Stored Communications Act generally stops a civil subpoena from reaching message or email content held by a provider; production comes from the party.
Read the full brief →

FAM-06 · 02

Valuing a Closely Held Business in Divorce

8 MIN · FAM

Two competent appraisers can value the same company months apart and land a third of the way from each other. The gap is almost never arithmetic; it is the legal assumptions the appraiser was told to use.

  • The standard of value — fair market value or fair value — is a legal question decided by state law, not a choice the appraiser makes.
  • Whether personal goodwill is marital property varies by state and often decides most of the value in a professional practice.
  • Marketability and minority discounts can move a number by a third; several states restrict or bar them in the divorce context.
Read the full brief →

FAM-08 · 03

Interstate Support Enforcement Under UIFSA

8 MIN · FAM

A move across a state line does not create a second support order or a second chance to relitigate. UIFSA keeps one order controlling and gives it a route into the new state.

  • UIFSA has been adopted in every state as a condition of federal funding, producing one controlling order rather than competing orders in each state.
  • The issuing state keeps continuing exclusive jurisdiction while a party or the child still lives there, so another state may enforce but not modify.
  • An income-withholding order can be sent directly to an out-of-state employer without any filing in the employer's state.
Read the full brief →